9/4/2023 0 Comments Tetragon rippleIn addition to its investment and collaborations, SBI also bought the Japanese exchange TaoTao in 2020. The Japanese giant has also since revealed plans for a cryptocurrency joint venture, partnering with crypto firms around the world. In fact, SBI Holdings came out in support of its co-collaborator during the lawsuit with Tetragon. This ruling, coupled with a separate filing the SEC made today, should put to rest any confusion the SEC has NOT determined that XRP is a security. Ripple Labs have had no such disputes with any other investors from that time. Team Ripple Today, the Court in Delaware rejected Tetragon’s claim that the SEC had officially determined XRP’s status. The funding round raised a total of $200 million, bringing Ripple’s value at the time to an estimated $10 billion. SBI Holdings, a Japanese financial company that was already in a joint venture with Ripple at the time (namely SBI Ripple Asia), also participated. Tetragon was among the leading investors in Ripple’s Series C round back in 2019. In doing so, it violated the United States Securities Act of 1933.Īt the time, Tetragon asked the Delaware Chancery Court to force Ripple Labs to call a halt to any transactions until it bought back $175 million worth of the shares it issued. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) professed that, since 2013, Ripple had raised over $1 billion with the sale of XRP. ( LSE: TFG), a UK based investment firm with 2.35 billion in assets under management, has sued Ripple in Delaware courts, according to a report by Bloomberg. The original allegations centered around a shareholder’s agreement between Tetragon and Ripple Labs, first entered in 2019. A lawsuit that Ripple Labs representatives called “ opportunistic.” The case goes back to January, where Tetragon, an investment management group based in the UK, sued Ripple to force it to buy back $175 million in shares. Litigation is a high-stakes game and Tetragon not only has to fulfill contractual obligations but pay two sets of lawyers.” Details of the case “I assume that the Ripple/Tetragon contract had a clause in it that the ‘prevailing party’ would receive attorney fees and costs from the other side.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |